Management Theories
Two-Factor Theory
Also Known As Motivator-Hygiene Theory
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Frederick Herzberg's 1959 theory that job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction come from two independent sets of factors: intrinsic motivators that create satisfaction, and extrinsic hygiene factors that only prevent dissatisfaction. Replication has been mixed: a 1973 study by George Hines found supervision and interpersonal relationships ranked highly among workers with high job satisfaction, contradicting Herzberg's clean dichotomy, and the original satisfaction/dissatisfaction split has separately been argued to be an artifact of Herzberg's own critical incident technique rather than an independent finding.
Facts
Disputed
Core ClaimJob satisfaction and job dissatisfaction are produced by two independent sets of workplace factors, not opposite ends of one scale: intrinsic motivators (achievement, recognition, responsibility, meaningful work) create satisfaction, while extrinsic hygiene factors (salary, job security, working conditions, company policy) only prevent dissatisfaction and do not themselves motivate. 2 Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
1. Wikipedia, Frederick Herzberg
1. Wikipedia, Frederick Herzberg
2. Wikipedia, Two-Factor Theory
Wikipedialead sectionQuote, lead section
there are certain factors in the workplace that cause job satisfaction while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction, all of which act independently of each other
View the Source 2. Wikipedia, Two-Factor Theory
WikipediaCriticismQuote, Criticism
supervision and interpersonal relationships were ranked highly by those with high job satisfaction
View the Source 2. Wikipedia, Two-Factor Theory
WikipediaQuote
The two-factor theory (also known as motivation-hygiene theory, motivator-hygiene theory, and dual-factor theory) states that there are certain factors in the workplace that cause job satisfaction while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction, all of which act independently of each other.
View the Source Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Core Claim
The clean split between motivators and hygiene factors has not held up consistently under replication. A 1973 study by George Hines found that supervision and interpersonal relationships, both classified by Herzberg as mere hygiene factors that only prevent dissatisfaction, were ranked highly by workers who reported HIGH job satisfaction, directly contradicting the theory's independence claim. Other critics have separately argued the original satisfaction/dissatisfaction split is an artifact of Herzberg's own critical incident technique rather than an independently verified finding.
A dissenting reading, from George Hines (1973 replication study)Wikipedia, Two-Factor Theory, Wikipedia
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.