The Wikipedia article on SWOT analysis, used for its dual 1965 origin claims (Stanford Research Institute Long Range Planning Service versus Harvard Business School), the 2023 Puyt et al. history rejecting the Harvard claim as an academic urban legend, and Hill and Westbrook (1997) academic criticism of its validity.
Facts
Citation
PublisherWikipedia
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis
Source TypeEncyclopedia
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Sources
Wikipedia, SWOT Analysis
Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)
This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Management Theories, 8 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 general references.
- Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Practice Disciplines, 1 claims: 1 connected.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.