Corporate Events
IBM Antitrust Case
Also Known As United States v. IBM
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The IBM antitrust case, formally United States v. International Business Machines Corp., was filed by the United States Department of Justice in 1969, alleging that IBM had violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by monopolizing or attempting to monopolize the market for general purpose electronic digital computer systems designed for business use, and later alleging anticompetitive conduct against computer leasing companies and makers of plug-compatible peripherals. Shortly after the suit was filed, IBM voluntarily unbundled its software and services from its hardware, a move widely credited to the pressure of the litigation and one that helped create an independent software industry. The case ran for thirteen years without a trial verdict; the Department of Justice withdrew it in January 1982, concluding it was without merit.
Facts
Cross-Tradition Connections
Sources
1. Wikipedia, IBM
Wikipedia1960s-1980s sectionQuote, 1960s-1980s section
In 1969, the United States of America alleged that IBM violated the Sherman Antitrust Act by monopolizing or attempting to monopolize the general-purpose electronic digital computer system market, specifically computers designed primarily for business, and subsequently alleged that IBM violated the antitrust laws in IBM's actions directed against leasing companies and plug-compatible peripheral manufacturers.
View the Source 1. Wikipedia, IBM
Frequently Asked Questions
Did the government win the IBM antitrust case?
No. After thirteen years of litigation with no trial verdict, the Department of Justice withdrew the case in January 1982, concluding it was without merit. IBM had already voluntarily unbundled its software and services from its hardware early in the litigation, a change many observers link to the lawsuit's pressure even though the case itself ended without a ruling against the company.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.