Business Atlas

How Enterprise Is Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Companies and Brands

Vickers-Armstrongs

Industrials
Facts
Company Type
British engineering conglomerate formed by the merger of the assets of Vickers Limited and Sir W G Armstrong Whitworth & Company in 1927 1
Founded Year
1927 1
Chronology
Dissolved Year
1977 1
Company Type
Company Type (category)
Conglomerate 2
Connections

Operates In

Source Vickers-Armstrongs (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactures

Also in Transport Atlas: manufactured by this subject.

Also in Transport Atlas: manufactured by this subject.

Also in Transport Atlas: manufactured by this subject.

Also in War and Military Atlas: manufactured by this subject.

Source Wikidata: Grand Slam

Also in War and Military Atlas: manufactured by this subject.

Source Wikidata: Valentine tank

Also in War and Military Atlas: manufactured by this subject.

Source Wikidata: Vickers .50 machine gun

Also in War and Military Atlas: manufactured by this subject.

Source Wikidata: Vickers K machine gun

Located In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is located.

Source Wikidata: Vickers-Armstrongs
Sources
1. Wikidata: Vickers-Armstrongs
Wikidata Q763052, weapon-system manufacturer (w-bbfill-military3-0926)View the Source
2. Vickers-Armstrongs (Wikipedia)
  • Lead sentence
    Vickers-Armstrongs Limited was a British engineering conglomerate formed by the merger of the assets of Vickers Limited and Sir W G Armstrong Whitworth & Company in 1927.
  • Operates In: Engineering Industry, Lead section, operates-in
    Vickers-Armstrongs Limited was a British engineering conglomerate formed by the merger of the assets of Vickers Limited and Sir W G Armstrong Whitworth & Company in 1927.
  • In Group: Industrial Conglomerates, Lead section
    Vickers-Armstrongs Limited was a British engineering conglomerate formed by the merger of the assets of Vickers Limited and Sir W G Armstrong Whitworth & Company in 1927.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.